<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>vide coding &#8211; AI Native Foundation</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ainativefoundation.org/tag/vide-coding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ainativefoundation.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:52:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Vibe-Code an App vs Buy One?</title>
		<link>https://ainativefoundation.org/vibe-code-an-app-vs-buy-one/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AINF]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[The Selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI Native]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vide coding]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ainativefoundation.org/?p=9147</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[David’s Note] SaaStr founder Jason Lemkin once defined a golden ratio for software: buy 90% off the shelf, and build only the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p><strong>[David’s Note]</strong></p>



<p><em>SaaStr founder Jason Lemkin once defined a golden ratio for software: buy 90% off the shelf, and build only the 10% that is truly unique. Yet, as we progress through 2026, the meteoric rise of &#8220;Vibe Coding&#8221;—is shifting the tectonic plates of procurement. In this edition, we explore why 80/20 is the new efficiency frontier: when AI can manifest a functional tool in minutes, paying a steep &#8220;Enterprise Tax&#8221; for generic SaaS may no longer be the most prudent move.</em></p>
</blockquote>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f4a1.png" alt="💡" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /></strong><strong> Core Value Logic: The Shift from 90/10 to 80/20</strong></h2>



<p>As AI capabilities accelerate, the &#8220;Build Boundary&#8221; of the modern enterprise is expanding:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>The Classic 90/10 Rule: </strong>Historically, building bespoke software was so prohibitively expensive that it was reserved for the 10% of &#8220;mission-critical, no-alternative&#8221; features. The rest was bought to avoid engineering agony.</li>



<li><strong>The Optimised 80/20 Strategy:</strong> In 2026, AI has lowered build-costs so significantly that firms are reclaiming an additional 10% of their stack. This second 10% consists of &#8220;fringe&#8221; tools (e.g., bespoke middleware, internal portals) where SaaS was previously too rigid or overpriced. <strong>The shift to 20% build is a strategic play for hyper-customisation and cost-efficiency.</strong></li>



<li><strong>The Infrastructure Hard-Line:</strong> Despite the 20% build-surge, 80% should still be bought. This core 80% represents <strong>security, API resilience, and regulatory compliance (e.g. SOC2)</strong>. AI is not yet capable of &#8220;vibing&#8221; its way through rigorous architectural standards and long-term stability.</li>
</ul>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f6e1.png" alt="🛡" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /></strong><strong> Ethical AI Commentary: Decentralised Power vs. Missing Accountability</strong></h2>



<p>The expansion of Vibe Coding from 10% to 20% introduces new governance challenges:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Code Sovereignty &amp; Transparency:</strong> As the build-ratio increases, so does the volume of &#8220;black-box&#8221; code within the firm. If AI embeds latent bias within this 20%, who is held accountable for the output?</li>
</ul>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Shadow IT &amp; Privacy:</strong> The ease of Vibe Coding empowers employees to bypass IT procurement. This risks the creation of unvetted tools handling sensitive customer data, creating a potential &#8220;compliance vacuum.&#8221;</li>
</ul>



<ol start="1" class="wp-block-list"></ol>



<p><strong>The Verdict:</strong> AI’s evolution allows us to move from 90/10 to 80/20 with confidence, but that <strong>relinquished 10% of SaaS budget must be reinvested into AI architectural auditing.</strong></p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<p><strong>Original Source:</strong> <em>“Dear SaaStr: When Should I Vibe-Code an App vs Buy One?”</em> via <a href="https://www.saastr.com/dear-saastr-when-should-i-vibe-code-an-app-vs-buy-one/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">SaaStr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
